Considering that there will not look like any "official" Load Data available for this Load, can a few of you provide a starting point with this combination and matters to think about when Doing the job this Load up?
H4831 will do the job within the Swift but not genuine effectively. You may under no circumstances have the pressures you would like for regularity Together with the .223. 760, or H414 might be much better but for some purpose I ain't the largest enthusiast of most ball powders.
It truly is most likely that no more discussion is required, where scenario we suggest commencing a new thread. If nevertheless you really feel your response is required you may even now do so.
243, and some of the loads I've commenced with consist of, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I am intending to shoot the IMR7828 loads first, accompanied by the W780 loads just so there will not be any surprises once the H-4831sc loads clearly show a shotgun sample! Who knows, I just could look for a use for it In any case.
In any case, I understood the two kilos of H4831SC utilized the identical data, but I did not know no matter whether there was nearly anything unique between a pound of powder labeled "Extreme" and 1 not so labeled. A contact to Hodgdon verified which they ended up in truth similar and the only real change was The emblem within the label.
It really is likely that no further discussion is necessary, wherein scenario we advise beginning a completely new thread. If even so you really feel your reaction is necessary you are able to however do so.
I don't like to operate up a load making use of a person great deal of powder and afterwards have to work up all over again since I operate h4831sc load data out and possess to begin using a new lot range.
excaliber mentioned: I've found the precise reverse to get real in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and Similarly precise powder in my 300 Get Mag.
I have discovered the exact opposite to get genuine in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and Similarly exact powder in my three hundred Gain Mag.
[electronic mail safeguarded] gn and a hundred and fifteen CT's, I have killed additional Deer with this particular combo than h4831sc load data many of the rifles I very own merged, Function approximately this but the sweet spot might be around 54, I'm a Two Bit-06 nut and I have some stuff tat performs rather well for h4831 vs h4831sc me if your interested
Run your load up with the specific powder (sc or regular) and lot you will be working with while. Similar burn up charge doesn't mean it will behave "specifically" the same. I have viewed in excess of 100 fps distinction between sc and mil-surp numerous H4831.
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but have a restricted offer of Varget, and a whole lot extra obtainable H4831SC. I shoot fifty five gr. loads almost exclusively, mainly because that is what the rifles shoot the ideal.
Am i able to presume that H4831 is usually substituted for H4831sc ? I realize the Actual physical big difference but will it have an affect on the burn up or velocity? I feel not but I am not 100% confident.
I discovered that my 7mag 160 partitions were sub MOA with 4831sc with small to min prices. I’m speaking 2700 (maybe 2800) fps, it was a small 60s grain cost in a Norma circumstance. Not what I was looking for, but precise Nevertheless.